> On 05 Feb 2016, at 14:11, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
>
> Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org> writes:
>
>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Jeff King <p...@peff.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> I suspect they were not really documented because nobody wanted to
>>> encourage their use. I don't think it would be wrong to document that
>>> they exist and are deprecated, though.
>>
>> They exist because some people seemed to think that people shouldn't
>> use "ssh://" since they thought that only ssh should use that.
>>
>> Which is obviously bullshit, since by that logic all the other formats
>> should have that idiotic "git+" format too ("git+https", anybody?). It
>> doesn't actually help anything, and it only pushes somebodys broken
>> agenda.
>>
>> So there was a push for that silly thing by a couple of people, but it
>> was always wrong. Don't even document it.
>
> […]
>
>> Leave it in the source code as an option, and maybe add a comment
>> about "This is stupid, but we support it for hysterical raisins".
>
> Sounds good.
OK then, let’s remove the reference from the manpage.
As peff guessed, this query is indeed triggered by having to make a decision
about whether libgit2 should support them. I suppose we’ll have to go in a
similar direction. Support them because people are using them (which is why a
user brought it up) but leave a comment that we don’t like it.
Cheers,
can--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
