Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> writes: >> Just in case it was unclear, none of the comment above means I want >> any part of the patch redone--I am happy with this patch as-is. > > Thanks for saying that... I was about to try to make things clearer, but I > could not think of a better term than "needs_cr".
I don't, either ;-). The primary reason I respond with the "I find this a bit confusing but it probably is just me" (not just to this patch) is to give an example of a review comment that demonstrates to the others that the reviewer understood what is in the patch and the issues around the change better than a mere unsubstantiated "These look OK to me.", which does not tell us how carefully the proposed change was reviewed by the reviewer--such a review does not allow me to "trust the review that is already done by others" and apply the patches with minimum cursory scanning and I end up having to carefully read them myself. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
