On 07 Dec 2015, at 19:51, Sam Hocevar <s...@hocevar.net> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 06, 2015, Lars Schneider wrote: >> Thanks for the patch! Do you see a way to demonstrate the bug in a test case >> similar to t9821 [1]? > > Not yet, I'm afraid. It's proving trickier than expected because for > now I can only reproduce the bug when the view uses multiples depots > (solution #2 on http://answers.perforce.com/articles/KB/2437), and > unfortunately the test case system in Git was designed for a single > depot. > > Would a refactor of lib-git-p4.sh (and probably all git-p4 tests) to > support multiple depots be acceptable and/or welcome? I prefer to ask > before I dig into the task.
Can you outline your idea a bit? Are you aware of the following way to define client specs: [1] ? Would that help? I haven't used multiple depots, yet. Therefore please bare with me :-) Thanks, Lars [1] https://github.com/git/git/blob/362d2fc2f8ab9ee22072f76fb36ec16918511944/t/t9821-git-p4-path-variations.sh#L109-L111 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
