Yes, without a doubt.  I think I'm blaming this one on being late on a
Friday afternoon, and really not thinking out the logic clearly. :)

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com> wrote:
>> +       else if (seen_bits & PACKDIR_FILE_PACK && seen_bits ^ 
>> ~PACKDIR_FILE_IDX)
>
> as just talked about: did you mention && !(seen_bits & FILE_IDX)
>>
>> +       if (seen_bits == 
>> (PACKDIR_FILE_PACK|PACKDIR_FILE_IDX|PACKDIR_FILE_BITMAP))
>> +               return;
>> +
>> +       if (seen_bits == 
>> (PACKDIR_FILE_PACK|PACKDIR_FILE_IDX|PACKDIR_FILE_KEEP))
>> +               return;
>> +
>> +       if (seen_bits == 
>> (PACKDIR_FILE_PACK|PACKDIR_FILE_IDX|PACKDIR_FILE_BITMAP|PACKDIR_FILE_KEEP))
>> +               return;
>
> I wonder if this should be rewritten as
>     if (seen_bits & FILE_PACK && seen_bits & FILE_IDX
>         && (seen_bits & FILE_KEEP || seen_bits & BITMAP))
>             return;
>
> to dense it a bit. ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to