On 04 Oct 2015, at 11:23, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: > larsxschnei...@gmail.com writes: > >> + if test_have_prereq CYGWIN; then >> + : # NOOP >> + elif test_have_prereq DARWIN; then >> + stat -f %Sp text | egrep ^-r-- && >> + stat -f %Sp text+x | egrep ^-r-x >> + else >> stat --format=%A text | egrep ^-r-- && >> stat --format=%A text+x | egrep ^-r-x >> fi > > Not a new problem but why do we need "stat" here? > > Shouldn't "test -r", "! test -x", and their usual friends be > sufficient for the purpose of the test and are more portable?
Good question. The stat call was introduced with df9c545 by Pete Wyckoff. @Pete, @Luke: Are you aware of any particular reason for stat? Thanks, Lars -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
