Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com> writes: > We should not care if the call to poll failed, as we're in an infinite loop > and > can only get out with the correct read(..).
I think I agree with that reasoning. The only thing we want out of this call to poll(2) is to delay calling read(2) again when we know we would get EAGAIN again; whether the reason why poll(2) returned is because of some error or because some data has become ready on the file descriptor, we no longer are in that "we know we would get EAGAIN" situation and do want to call read(2), which would return either the right error or perform a successful read to make some progress. Sounds sensible. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
