Karthik Nayak <karthik....@gmail.com> writes:
> /* Print detached HEAD before sorting and printing the rest */
> - if (detached) {
> - print_ref_item(&ref_list.list[index - 1], maxwidth, verbose,
> abbrev,
> - detached, remote_prefix);
> - index -= 1;
> + if (filter->kind & FILTER_REFS_DETACHED_HEAD) {
> + print_ref_item(array.items[array.nr - 1], maxwidth, filter,
> remote_prefix);
> + free_array_item(array.items[array.nr - 1]);
> + array.nr--;
Ah, this answers my previous remark: indeed, you are removing the
element from the array completely after this patch. You may want to
modify the previous patch to start doing it earlier, but I think it's
not worth the trouble: I agree with the final state, only the
intermediate state is suboptimal (but still acceptable to me at least).
--
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
