Eric Sunshine <sunsh...@sunshineco.com> writes:
>> @@ -624,6 +633,33 @@ static void find_subpos(const char *buf, unsigned long
>> sz,
>> *nonsiglen = *sig - buf;
>> }
>>
>> +/*
>> + * If 'lines' is greater than 0, append that many lines from the given
>> + * 'buf' of length 'size' to the given strbuf.
>> + */
>> +static void append_lines(struct strbuf *out, const char *buf, unsigned long
>> size, int lines)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> + const char *sp, *eol;
>> + size_t len;
>> +
>> + if ((sp = strstr(buf, "\n\n")) && (sp <= buf + size))
>> + size += 2;
>
> Aside from the +2 which Matthieu already questioned, this code has a
> much more serious problem. strstr() assumes that 'buf' is
> NUL-terminated, however, the fact that buf's size is also being passed
> to the function, implies that it may not be NUL-terminated.
If Karthik applies my suggestion, then the strstr would go away. I think
the code would be correct even on non-null-terminated strings.
Actually, we're already making the assumption that the buffer for the
whole tag object is null-terminated (and contains no '\0') for
%(contents):
else if (!strcmp(name, "contents"))
v->s = xstrdup(subpos);
(But I agree that even if the assumption is correct, it should be made
explicit if it remains a precondition of append_lines).
--
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
