On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: > Eric Sunshine <sunsh...@sunshineco.com> writes: > >> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Johannes Sixt <j...@kdbg.org> wrote: >>> Invoking plink requires special treatment, and we have support and even >>> test cases for the commands 'plink' and 'tortoiseplink'. We also support >>> .exe variants for these two and there is a test for 'plink.exe'. >>> >>> On Windows, however, where support for plink.exe would be relevant, the >>> test case fails because it is not possible to execute a file with a .exe >>> extension that is actually not a binary executable---it is a shell >>> script in our test. We have to disable the test case on Windows. >>> >>> Considering, that 'plink.exe' is irrelevant on non-Windows, let's just >>> remove the test and assume that the code "just works". >> >> putty and plink are used on Unix as well. A quick check of Mac OS X, >> Linux, and FreeBSD reveals that package managers on each platform have >> putty and plink packages available. > > But they do not force their users to say "plink.exe", but instead > let them invoke "plink", no? > > The test before the one that was removed is about "plink" (sans .exe), > and what was removed is with ".exe", so I think J6t's patch is OK.
Ah, you're correct. I overlooked the extra emphasis j6t's commit message placed on ".exe". -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
