Matthieu Moy <matthieu....@grenoble-inp.fr> writes: > Christian Couder <christian.cou...@gmail.com> writes: > >> On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 6:25 AM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: >>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Christian Couder >>> <christian.cou...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> If we don't want to support positional arguments, then I would suggest >>>> supporting first the following instead: >>>> >>>> git bisect terms --name-good=fast --name-bad=slow >>>> git bisect terms --name-bad=slow --name-good=fast >>>> >>>> This would make the interface consistent with the code. >>> >>> Which somewhat defeats the point of introducing "old" and "new", though. >>> The "terms" support is for people who feel that good/bad would be too >>> confusing >>> for the particular bisect session (e.g. because they are hunting for a fix). >> >> Well if --name-old and --name-new are also available as synonyms, it >> would not be too bad I think. >> People could use the option names that fit their mental model or their >> use case better. > > OK, I'll add both.
I moderately hate to see both from aesthetics point of view, but can we at least lose "--name-" prefix? Having to repeat that twice does not add any value to the subcommand. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
