Matthieu Moy <matthieu....@grenoble-inp.fr> writes: > Torsten Bögershausen <tbo...@web.de> writes: > >> My v3 will probably use the original line: >> git-checkout - Checkout a branch or paths to the working tree > > I think mentionning "Switch branch" was a real improvement. For someone > not familiar with the version control vocabulary, "checkout" does not > mean much (just looked in a dictionary, it talks about payment and > leaving a room in a hotel ...). And someone not understanding what > "checkout" means in this context won't be helped much reading the > description and getting "checkout" there.
Or, borrow a book from a library, which I think is the closest analogy for this operation. But you are right. It is suboptimal to explain "checkout" in terms of "checkout" ;-). > But as you say, it copies into the workspace, so "copy a previous > version into the workspace" sounds good to me. I am afraid that "previous" would lead to "Ah, you mean HEAD~1?" confusion. In any case, you cannot copy what hasn't yet been created, "previous" is superfluous. I think "restore" also by definition has to go back to _some_ existing version, not a future yet-to-be-created one, so "restore to some previous state" is superfluous; in that sense, I find that "restore working tree files" may still be the one that makes most sense, at least to me, among the phrases floated in this thread so far. > Basically, I'm fine with anything starting with "Switch branches or", > but please do change the headline ;-). Likewise; I agree "switch branches or" part is good. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
