On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 02:23:47PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > What this series wants to achieve makes a lot of sense to me. One > comment I have after skimming the patfches is that I want the new > "raw" bit added not as a yet another parameter after "verbose", but > by turning the existing "verbose" into an "unsigned flag" flag word > (with "#define GPG_VERIFY_VERBOSE 01") and then defining use of a > new bit in the same flag word "#define GPG_VERIFY_RAW 01" or > something. That way, over time other people add differnt things to > the interface, we would not have to end up with 47 different > parameters each of which signals a single bit.
I'll wait for other responses (if any) and then reroll. -- brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US +1 832 623 2791 | http://www.crustytoothpaste.net/~bmc | My opinion only OpenPGP: RSA v4 4096b: 88AC E9B2 9196 305B A994 7552 F1BA 225C 0223 B187
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
