Hi, "Paul Tan" <pyoka...@gmail.com> : > I haven't kept up with the discussion, but I'm wondering: since you > need the functionality in wt-status.c, why not implement it in git > status? In fact, git-status already shows if there is a rebase in > progress, so why not extend it to say which patch/todo line the rebase > stopped on? It feels much more natural to me to use git-status to > check the status of the rebase, instead of git rebase --status. > Thanks, Paul
It's a question I have asked myself but since git rebase --status will certainly display more information maybe it's better to separate the two commands, and to indicate the user that git rebase --status exists in git status during a rebase. If we choose to use git status, it could be an option to display the full information since it currently gives very few information. I'm not sure what -verbose does but it could be its role. Thanks, Guillaume Pagès -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
