On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:20 AM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
> Duy Nguyen <pclo...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Alternatively, we can record SHA-1 in the shallow file as refs whose
>> name is always ".shallow". This way "unbundle" can recreate the
>> shallow file if it wants.
>
> Wouldn't the extracting end care about such a name ".shallow" being
> duplicates (if you have multiple boundaries) or not check-ref-format
> kosher?

I think we are careful to ignore funny ref names, so it should not be
a problem. But I haven't tested this.

> I was hoping we will have a solution for a new bundle command to
> create a bundle out of a shallow repository that is somehow usable
> by existing 'git bundle' implementations.  You may take a bundle out
> of a shallow repository to preserve your work on top since you made
> the shallow clone originally, and then send it to your friend with
> existing 'git bundle' implementation to extract it into his full
> clone to sneaker-net.

OK two additional options on top of what we already have:

 - save .have and add extra prerequisite SHA-1.
 - create a bundle that does not hit shallow boundary in the first
place, roughly speaking it's "max depth minus one". This one does not
have extra .have or prerequisites
-- 
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to