On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 04:40:37PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Now I read the callers, it does look like this new function better > fits in the run-command suite, essentially allowing us to do what we > would do with $(cmd) or `cmd` in shell and Perl scripts, even though > I do not particularly agree with the phrase "layering violation" to > call its current placement.
I was on the fence, and you both seem to prefer it in run-command, so here is a re-roll in that direction (no other changes). [1/7]: wt-status: don't flush before running "submodule status" [2/7]: wt_status: fix signedness mismatch in strbuf_read call [3/7]: run-command: introduce capture_command helper [4/7]: wt-status: use capture_command [5/7]: submodule: use capture_command [6/7]: trailer: use capture_command [7/7]: run-command: forbid using run_command with piped output -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
