Am 20.03.2015 um 11:13 schrieb Jeff King:
This script misses a trivial &&-chain in one of its tests, but it also has a weird reverse: it includes an &&-chain outside of any test_expect block! This "cat" should never fail, but if it did, we would not notice, as it would cause us to skip the follow-on test entirely (which does not appear intentional; there are many later tests which rely on this cat).Let's instead move the setup into its own test_expect_success block, which is the standard practice nowadays. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <p...@peff.net> --- t/t9502-gitweb-standalone-parse-output.sh | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/t/t9502-gitweb-standalone-parse-output.sh b/t/t9502-gitweb-standalone-parse-output.sh index 86dfee2..a93e159 100755 --- a/t/t9502-gitweb-standalone-parse-output.sh +++ b/t/t9502-gitweb-standalone-parse-output.sh @@ -145,9 +145,11 @@ test_expect_success 'forks: not skipped unless "forks" feature enabled' ' grep -q ">fork of .*<" gitweb.body ' -cat >>gitweb_config.perl <<\EOF && -$feature{'forks'}{'default'} = [1]; -EOF +test_expect_success 'enable forks feature' ' + cat >>gitweb_config.perl <<-\EOF + $feature{'forks'}{'default'} = [1]; + EOF +'
This loses the single-quotes in the generated perl script, doesn't it? Most likely, it does not matter.
-- Hannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
