Michael J Gruber <[email protected]> writes: > status, status -s and the like are in an ordinary user's tool box. > ls-files isn't, at least not with "-t", which we even mark as deprecated. > > That makes me wonder, though, how difficult it would be to > wt_status_collect_unchanged() and to leverage the status machinery > rather than ls-files.
Good point. wt-status feels like a much better infrastructure to build on than "ls-files -t", which should die ;-). Especially if the command is interested in showing the state of the working tree files relative to the tree of HEAD, as "ls-files" is purely between the index and the working tree. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
