Michael Haggerty <mhag...@alum.mit.edu> writes:

> write_ref_sha1() previously skipped the write if the reference already
> had the desired value, unless lock->force_write was set. Instead,
> perform that test at the callers.
>
> Two of the callers (in rename_ref()) unconditionally set force_write
> just before calling write_ref_sha1(), so they don't need the extra
> check at all. Nor do they need to set force_write anymore.

Good.  I recall that this convoluted "the callee checks if the
values are the same so we need to tell it not to do that" logic
looked very disturbing.



> The last caller, in ref_transaction_commit(), still needs the test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhag...@alum.mit.edu>
> ---
>  refs.c | 18 +++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/refs.c b/refs.c
> index d1130e2..651e37e 100644
> --- a/refs.c
> +++ b/refs.c
> @@ -2878,7 +2878,6 @@ int rename_ref(const char *oldrefname, const char 
> *newrefname, const char *logms
>               error("unable to lock %s for update", newrefname);
>               goto rollback;
>       }
> -     lock->force_write = 1;
>       hashcpy(lock->old_sha1, orig_sha1);
>       if (write_ref_sha1(lock, orig_sha1, logmsg)) {
>               error("unable to write current sha1 into %s", newrefname);
> @@ -2894,7 +2893,6 @@ int rename_ref(const char *oldrefname, const char 
> *newrefname, const char *logms
>               goto rollbacklog;
>       }
>  
> -     lock->force_write = 1;
>       flag = log_all_ref_updates;
>       log_all_ref_updates = 0;
>       if (write_ref_sha1(lock, orig_sha1, NULL))
> @@ -3080,10 +3078,6 @@ static int write_ref_sha1(struct ref_lock *lock,
>       static char term = '\n';
>       struct object *o;
>  
> -     if (!lock->force_write && !hashcmp(lock->old_sha1, sha1)) {
> -             unlock_ref(lock);
> -             return 0;
> -     }
>       o = parse_object(sha1);
>       if (!o) {
>               error("Trying to write ref %s with nonexistent object %s",
> @@ -3797,15 +3791,21 @@ int ref_transaction_commit(struct ref_transaction 
> *transaction,
>               struct ref_update *update = updates[i];
>  
>               if (!is_null_sha1(update->new_sha1)) {
> -                     if (write_ref_sha1(update->lock, update->new_sha1,
> -                                        update->msg)) {
> +                     if (!update->lock->force_write &&
> +                         !hashcmp(update->lock->old_sha1, update->new_sha1)) 
> {
> +                             unlock_ref(update->lock);
> +                             update->lock = NULL;
> +                     } else if (write_ref_sha1(update->lock, 
> update->new_sha1,
> +                                               update->msg)) {
>                               update->lock = NULL; /* freed by write_ref_sha1 
> */
>                               strbuf_addf(err, "Cannot update the ref '%s'.",
>                                           update->refname);
>                               ret = TRANSACTION_GENERIC_ERROR;
>                               goto cleanup;
> +                     } else {
> +                             /* freed by write_ref_sha1(): */
> +                             update->lock = NULL;
>                       }
> -                     update->lock = NULL; /* freed by write_ref_sha1 */
>               }
>       }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to