On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:12 AM, Michael Haggerty <mhag...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> By the way, both of these patch series conflict with > sb/atomic-push-fix, which is in pu. My understanding is that Stefan > wants to rework that patch series anyway, but if not I would be happy > to show how to resolve the conflicts. Heh, I had it already reworked on Friday evening, but forgot to send it out for review. As mentioned before, sb/atomic-push-fix is a misleading branch name as it actually enables large transactions [ "large" means > $(ulimit -n) ]. I don't mind reworking that series again on top of either this or the other patch series you sent out, as I wasn't entirely happy with it anyway. (Naming is hard) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
