Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> writes:
>> sub add_untracked_cmd {
>> - my @add = list_and_choose({ PROMPT => 'Add untracked' },
>> - list_untracked());
>> - if (@add) {
>> - system(qw(git update-index --add --), @add);
>> - say_n_paths('added', @add);
>> + if (system(qw(git ls-files --others --exclude-standard --))) {
>
> But this ls-files invocation that knows too much about how
> list_untracked() computes things does not.
>
> Why not
> ...
> or something instead?
Actually, is there any case where list_and_choose() should give a
prompt to choose from zero candidates?
In other words, I am wondering if this affects other callers of
list_and_choose in any negative way.
git-add--interactive.perl | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/git-add--interactive.perl b/git-add--interactive.perl
index 94b988c..46ed9a7 100755
--- a/git-add--interactive.perl
+++ b/git-add--interactive.perl
@@ -519,6 +519,10 @@ sub error_msg {
sub list_and_choose {
my ($opts, @stuff) = @_;
my (@chosen, @return);
+
+ if (!@stuff) {
+ return @return;
+ }
my $i;
my @prefixes = find_unique_prefixes(@stuff) unless $opts->{LIST_ONLY};
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
