Eric Wong <normalper...@yhbt.net> writes:
> Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
>> Thanks. No tests necessary/feasible? Just being curious.
>
> They seemed simple and obvious enough to me,
> (and most importantly, didn't trigger regressions).
I can see that the top-most one is about .git that is a textual
symlink ".gitdir: <elsewhere>" and the code after this part needed
to convert it to the real place in order to be able to read/write
"${GIT_DIR}/<some file>", so that is obvious to me.
But the other one just says "handle missing ref_id case correctly"
without clarifying what is incorrect in the original and how the
desired correct behaviour is different (in other words, what breaks
without this change)
To which a natural reaction was "Can the existing breakage
demonstrated by a test?".
If it is obvious for git-svn folks, then I wouldn't complain,
though.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
