On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 02:55:30PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > With the patch applied on top of 1da1e07c (or the result merged to > 'next' for that matter), I see test breakages in many places "git > blame" is used, e.g. t7010. Did you run the test suite? > > This is because it is perfectly normal for prepare_final() to return > NULL. Unconditionally running xstrdup() would of course fail.
Eek. I even thought of this possibility and checked the prepare_initial callsite, but not the prepare_final one. As an aside, I have often been tempted to have xstrdup silently propagate a NULL. It would have been the right thing to do here, but maybe there are cases where the segfault is preferable for catching a mistake early (otherwise you might store the NULL and then segfault much later). -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
