On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Stefan Beller <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Ronnie Sahlberg <[email protected]>
>
> This adds support to send-pack to negotiate and use atomic pushes
> iff the server supports it. Atomic pushes are activated by a new command
> line flag --atomic.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <[email protected]>
> ---
> diff --git a/builtin/send-pack.c b/builtin/send-pack.c
> index b564a77..b961e5a 100644
> --- a/builtin/send-pack.c
> +++ b/builtin/send-pack.c
> @@ -282,6 +282,30 @@ free_return:
> return update_seen;
> }
>
> +
> +static int atomic_push_failure(struct send_pack_args *args,
> + struct ref *remote_refs,
> + struct ref *failing_ref)
> +{
> + struct ref *ref;
> + /* Mark other refs as failed */
> + for (ref = remote_refs; ref; ref = ref->next) {
> + if (!ref->peer_ref && !args->send_mirror)
> + continue;
> +
> + switch (ref->status) {
> + case REF_STATUS_EXPECTING_REPORT:
> + ref->status = REF_STATUS_ATOMIC_PUSH_FAILED;
> + continue;
> + default:
> + ; /* do nothing */
> + }
> + }
> + error("atomic push failed for ref %s. status: %d\n",
> + failing_ref->name, failing_ref->status);
> + return -1;
Not itself worth a re-send, but if you do re-send for some other reason...
return error(...);
would be more idiomatic (as mentioned in the previous review).
> +}
> +
> int send_pack(struct send_pack_args *args,
> int fd[], struct child_process *conn,
> struct ref *remote_refs,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
