On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 01:18:43PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes: > > > On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 02:26:55PM -0500, Jeff King wrote: > > > >> > Makes sense, including the use of strbuf (otherwise you would > >> > allocate ce and then discard when it turns out that it is not > >> > needed, which is probably with the same allocation pressure, but > >> > looks uglier). > >> > >> Exactly. Constructing it in ce->name does save you an allocation/memcpy > >> in the case that we actually use the new entry, but I thought it would > >> look weirder. It probably doesn't matter much either way, so I tried to > >> write the most obvious thing. > > > > Actually, it is not that bad: > > Yeah, actually it does look better; want me to squash it into the > patch before queuing?
Yeah, if you like it, too, then let's go with it. Thanks. -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
