Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes: > if (c != '.' && > - is_date(num3, num, num2, refuse_future, now, tm)) > + is_date(num3, num, num2, refuse_future, now, tm, 0)) > break;
Doesn't the new argument '0', which is "allow-future", look somewhat strange when we are already passing refuse_future? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
