Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes:

>> Hmph. I had originally intended to make this "set -x;" with a semicolon,
>> to keep it split from $*. But I forgot to, and much to my surprise, all
>> of the tests still passed.

Yup, I was wondering why you posted a version without the semicolon,
which looked obviously bogus, as I've never seen you post an
untested thing without marking as such.

> +     # The test itself is run with stderr put back to &4 (so either to
> +     # /dev/null, or to the original stderr if --verbose was used).
> +     {
> +             test_eval_inner_ "$@" </dev/null >&3 2>&4
> +             test_eval_ret_=$?
> +             if test "$trace" = t
> +             then
> +                     set +x
> +                     if test "$test_eval_ret_" != 0
> +                     then
> +                             say_color error >&4 "error: last command exited 
> with \$?=$test_eval_ret_"
> +                     fi
> +             fi
> +     } 2>/dev/null

Hmph, that is a clever way to squelch output from set+x (and
everything that runs after the eval returns) I never thought of.

Nice.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to