On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 03:03:33PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > From: Jeff King <p...@peff.net> > Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 16:31:46 -0400 > > Upon finding a corrupt loose object, we forgot to note the error to > signal it with the exit status of the entire process. > > [jc: adjusted t1450 and added another test] > > Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> > --- > > * I think your fix is a right one that catches all the "we can > parse minimally for the purpose of 'struct object' class system, > but the object is semantically broken" cases, as fsck_obj() is > where such a validation should all happen. > > I can haz a sign off? Thanks.
Thanks, I think this is a step forward regardless of other conversation on the exit code, as it is just harmonizing loose and packed object behavior. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <p...@peff.net> -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
