On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Matthieu Moy
<matthieu....@grenoble-inp.fr> wrote:
> Tanay Abhra <tanay...@gmail.com> writes:
>> +struct config_cache_entry {
>> +     struct hashmap_entry ent;
>> +     char *key;
>> +     struct string_list *value_list;
>> +};
>
> I guess this crossed Eric's remark about the fact that this is a
> pointer.
>
>> +static void config_cache_free(void)
>
> I didn't look closely enough to make sure there were no memory leak
> remaining, but did you check with valgrind --leak-check that it is the
> case in practice?

It does leak the config_cache_entry::value_list member which was
xcalloc()'d in config_cache_set_value().  (I didn't mention it in my
reviews because I was expecting 'value_list' to be changed to a plain
structure rather than a pointer to a structure.)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to