Anders Kaseorg <ande...@mit.edu> writes: >> How bad does the documentation look with the patch applied (I know how >> bad it looks without source-highlight installed)? If it is not too bad, >> then it sounds like a sensible solution to drop the highlight markup >> unconditionally like the patch that started this thread does, taking the >> "common denominator" approach. You seem to agree, and I do not object, >> either. > > Original version with syntax-highlight installed (pretty): > http://web.mit.edu/andersk/Public/api-hashmap/old-highlight.html > > Original version with syntax-highlight missing (corrupted): > http://web.mit.edu/andersk/Public/api-hashmap/old-no-highlight.html > > Patched version (boring but readable): > http://web.mit.edu/andersk/Public/api-hashmap/patched.html
Thanks. I've queued the patch for v2.0 and the comparison between the first and the third clearly shows that it is the right thing to do ;-). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
