Karen Etheridge wrote: > > scenario: > - edit some tracked files; do not add them to the index > - "git config rebase.autostash true" > - "git rebase -i HEAD~3" (an autostash will be created) > - delete the entire buffer and save/exit the editor - this will abort the > rebase > > poof, the autostash is gone (it is not reapplied) -- it must be explicitly > applied again via the SHA that was printed earlier.
Yeah, I noticed this issue while rewriting `git rebase` in Ruby. I also noticed many other issues and inconsistencies that happen depending on what arguments you pass to `git rebase`. I'm in the process of writing a much more improved and consistent `git rebase` in Ruby with a different interface. Sadly it's still not ready. > (please cc me; I am not subscribed to the list.) No need to say that, only on mailing lists that do Reply-To munging, and Git is not one of them. Cheers. -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
