W. Trevor King wrote: > On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 01:55:36PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: > > W. Trevor King wrote: > > > On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 08:14:29PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: > > > > W. Trevor King wrote: > > > > > My proposed --prompt behavior is for folks who think “I often run > > > > > this command without thinking it through all the way. I'm also > > > > > not used to reading Git's output and using 'reset --hard' with the > > > > > reflog to reverse changes. Instead of trusting me to only say > > > > > what I mean or leaving me to recover from mistakes, please tell me > > > > > what's about to change and let me opt out if I've changed my > > > > > mind.” > > > > > > > > Unfortunately those folks by definition wouldn't know about the > > > > --prompt option. > > > > > > But once such folks are identified, you just have to convince them > > > (once) to set the pull.prompt config. That's a lot easier than > > > convincing them (for every pull) to set the appropriate ff flag. > > > > It wouldn't matter if by the default non-fast-forward merges are > > rejected. > > It would matter if you didn't want them making non-fast-forward merges > (e.g. for explicitly-merged topic branches).
It would matter almost exactly zero. And just as they can do pull.promot = true, they can do pull.mode = fetch-only. -- Felipe Contreras-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
