Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> writes: > Just a thought. > > I am wondering if you may want to go the other way around. That is, > instead of using "we have byte-order, big and little and the way to > determine endianness is to see byte-order matches which of the > latter two", use "there may be either big or little but not both > defined, and that is how you learn the byte-order". > > And make these two macros match what Solaris happens to use. > > I am not sure which variant I like better myself, though. > ...
The "how-about-this" patch in the pregvious message forgets the default case where byte-order, little and big are defined with leading double underscore, which must also be handled, if we want to take this aproach. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
