On 04/29/2014 08:58 PM, Ronnie Sahlberg wrote: > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 2:25 AM, Michael Haggerty <mhag...@alum.mit.edu> > wrote: >> [...] >> Unless we want to make ref_transaction objects reusable. [...] > ACK, but I don't think we need reusable transaction yet. Once the API > is cleaned up > it should be reasonably easy to add in the future if we see a need for it. > Sounds reasonable to you ?
Yes, reusable transaction objects would be pretty straightforward to retrofit, so I agree that there is no need to implement it now. Michael -- Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu http://softwareswirl.blogspot.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
