On 04.03.2014, at 09:42, Tanay Abhra <tanay...@gmail.com> wrote: [...]
> commit.c | 17 +++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/commit.c b/commit.c
> index 6bf4fe0..6c92acb 100644
> --- a/commit.c
> +++ b/commit.c
[...]
> @@ -566,14 +566,16 @@ static void record_author_date(struct author_date_slab
> *author_date,
> buf;
> buf = line_end + 1) {
> line_end = strchrnul(buf, '\n');
> - if (!starts_with(buf, "author ")) {
> + ident_line = skip_prefix(buf, "author ");
> + if (!ident_line) {
> if (!line_end[0] || line_end[1] == '\n')
> return; /* end of header */
> continue;
> }
> + buf = ident_line;
> if (split_ident_line(&ident,
> - buf + strlen("author "),
> - line_end - (buf + strlen("author "))) ||
> + buf,
> + line_end - buf) ||
> !ident.date_begin || !ident.date_end)
> goto fail_exit; /* malformed "author" line */
> break;
Why not get rid of that assignment to "buf", and use ident_line instead of buf
below? That seems like it would be more readable, wouldn't it?
> @@ -1193,10 +1195,9 @@ static void parse_gpg_output(struct signature_check
> *sigc)
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sigcheck_gpg_status); i++) {
> const char *found, *next;
>
> - if (starts_with(buf, sigcheck_gpg_status[i].check + 1)) {
> - /* At the very beginning of the buffer */
> - found = buf + strlen(sigcheck_gpg_status[i].check + 1);
> - } else {
> + found = skip_prefix(buf, sigcheck_gpg_status[i].check + 1);
> + /* At the very beginning of the buffer */
Do we really need that comment, and in that spot? The code seemed clear enough
to me without it. But if you think keeping is better, perhaps move it to
*before* the skip_prefix, and add a trailing "?"
> + if(!found) {
> found = strstr(buf, sigcheck_gpg_status[i].check);
> if (!found)
> continue;
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
