Should I also update the relevant git.pot and *.po sections? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Junio C Hamano" <gits...@pobox.com> To: "Jonathan Nieder" <jrnie...@gmail.com> Cc: "Sandy Carter" <sandy.car...@savoirfairelinux.com>, git@vger.kernel.org, "jn avila" <jn.av...@free.fr>, "Carlos MartÃn Nieto" <c...@elego.de> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 6:31:32 PM Subject: Re: [PATCH] i18n: proposed command missing leading dash
Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com> writes: > To make life saner for translators, this should be either > untranslatable or a single multi-line string, I suspect: > > diff --git i/builtin/branch.c w/builtin/branch.c > index b4d7716..972040c 100644 > --- i/builtin/branch.c > +++ w/builtin/branch.c > @@ -1022,11 +1022,13 @@ int cmd_branch(int argc, const char **argv, const > char *prefix) > */ > if (argc == 1 && track == BRANCH_TRACK_OVERRIDE && > !branch_existed && remote_tracking) { > - fprintf(stderr, _("\nIf you wanted to make '%s' track > '%s', do this:\n\n"), head, branch->name); > - fprintf(stderr, _(" git branch -d %s\n"), > branch->name); > - fprintf(stderr, _(" git branch --set-upstream-to > %s\n"), branch->name); > + fprintf(stderr, "\n"); > + fprintf(stderr, _("If you wanted to make '%s' track > '%s', do this:\n\n" > + " git branch -d %s\n" > + " git branch --set-upstream-to > %s"), > + head, branch->name, branch->name, > branch->name); > + fprintf(stderr, "\n"); > } > - > } else > usage_with_options(builtin_branch_usage, options); > > What do you think? Yes, I think it is sensible to make sure that the command examples are not corrupted by the _() process. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html