On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Duy Nguyen <pclo...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 8:23 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: >> Johannes Sixt <j.s...@viscovery.net> writes: >> >>> Am 2/12/2014 13:55, schrieb David Kastrup: >>>> Johannes Sixt <j.s...@viscovery.net> writes: >>>> >>>>> Running test suite of 'next' on Windows fails in t5310-pack-bitmaps with >>>>> the following symptoms. I haven't followed the topic. Have there been >>>>> patches floating that addressed the problem in one way or another? >>>>> >>>>> (gdb) run >>>>> Starting program: D:\Src\mingw-git\t\trash >>>>> directory.t5310-pack-bitmaps/..\..\git.exe rev-list --test-bitmap >>>>> HEAD >>>>> [New thread 3528.0x8d4] >>>>> Bitmap v1 test (20 entries loaded) >>>>> Found bitmap for 537ea4d3eb79c95f602873b1167c480006d2ac2d. 64 bits >>>>> / 15873b36 checksum >>>> >>>> Does reverting a201c20b41a2f0725977bcb89a2a66135d776ba2 help? >>> >>> YES! t5310 passes after reverting this commit. >> >> Oh. I just looked through the backtrace until finding a routine >> reasonably related with the regtest and checked for the last commit >> changing it, then posted my question. >> >> Then I looked through the diff of the patch and considered it >> unconspicuous. So I commenced reading through earlier commits. >> >> I actually don't have a good idea what might be wrong here. The code is >> somewhat distasteful as it basically uses eword_t and uint64_t >> interchangeably, but then this does match its current definition. > > Perhaps __BYTE_ORDER or __BIG_ENDIAN is misdefined and the ntohll() is > skipped?
That is indeed the case. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
