Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> writes:
> Øystein Walle <oys...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> + git stash &&
>> + test_tick &&
>> + echo cow > file &&
>> + git stash &&
>> + git stash apply "stash@{Thu Apr 7 15:17:13 2005 -0700}" &&
>
> This is brittle. If new tests are added before this, the test_tick
> will give you different timestamp and this test will start failing.
>
> Perhaps grab the timestamp out of the stash that was created [...]
Hmm, now that I stare at this, why not simply use something like
git stash apply "stash@{ 0 }"
It seems to refer to the same as stash@{0} as one would expect, while
still triggering the bug with unpatched git-stash.
--
Thomas Rast
t...@thomasrast.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
