Jakub Narębski <[email protected]>:
> > No, cvs-fast-export does not have --export-marks. It doesn't generate the
> > SHA1s that would require. Even if it did, it's not clear how that would
> > help.
>
> I was thinking about how the following part of git-fast-export
> `--import-marks=<file>`
>
> Any commits that have already been marked will not be exported again.
> If the backend uses a similar --import-marks file, this allows for
> incremental
> bidirectional exporting of the repository by keeping the marks the same
> across runs.
I understand that. But it's not relevant - cvs-fast-import doesn't know about
git SHA1s, and cannot.
> How cvs-fast-export know where to start exporting from in incremental mode?
You give it a cutoff date. This is the same way cvsps-2.x and 3.x worked,
and it's what the cvsimport wrapper expects to pass down.
> BTW. does cvs-fast-export support incremental *output*, or does it
> perform also incremental *work*?
As I tried to explain previously in my response to John Herland, it's
incremental output only. There is *no* CVS exporter known to me, or
him, that supports incremental work. That would be at best be impractically
difficult; given CVS's limitations it may be actually impossible. I wouldn't
bet against impossible.
> Anyway, that might mean that generic fast-import stream based incremental
> (i.e. supporting proper thin fetch) remote helper is out of question, perhaps
> writing one for cvs / cvs-fe would bring incremental import from CVS to
> git?
Sorry, I don't understand that.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
