On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Eric Sunshine <sunsh...@sunshineco.com> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy > <pclo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> diff --git a/t/t5536-fetch-shallow.sh b/t/t5536-fetch-shallow.sh >> index e011ead..95b6313 100755 >> --- a/t/t5536-fetch-shallow.sh >> +++ b/t/t5536-fetch-shallow.sh >> @@ -141,4 +141,26 @@ EOF >> ) >> ' >> >> +test_expect_success 'fetch --update-shallow' ' >> + ( >> + cd notshallow && >> + git fetch --update-shallow ../shallow/.git >> refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/shallow/* && >> + git fsck && >> + git for-each-ref --format="%(refname)" |sort >actual.refs && > > Exit status of git-for-each-ref could be lost down the pipe.
I think it's ok. If for-each-ref is broken or something the final output in actual.refs will be different anyway. -- Duy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
