On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 06:58:55PM +0100, Thomas Rast wrote:

> > I didn't touch that. Vicent, did you have a comment on the name (it
> > really does look like it is a negation, and the only caller is
> > ewah_not).
> 
> Hmm, so it really was that one unlucky thing :-)

I don't promise there is only one unlucky thing. :) Only that we made a
good faith effort to address the comments. There were a lot of comments
and a lot of re-rolls, and I would not be surprised if something else
was missed (I am not thinking of anything in particular, but just
preparing you mentally).

> I don't have much to say on the area, but if you think it helps you I
> can set aside some time RSN to review the second half of the series,
> too.  Back in June I only looked at the first half.

I would love that. My comments to Junio were not to rush the topic, but
mainly to keep it progressing.

Re-rolling such a big chunk of code _is_ a pain for both me and for
reviewers, so I wouldn't mind switching to "fixes on top" instead of
re-rolling at some point. But we can do another round or two of re-roll
first.

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to