Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> writes: > Thomas Rast <t...@thomasrast.ch> writes: > >> The next patch will document gitk -L, but gitk does not understand the >> separated form ('gitk -L :foo:bar' results in an error). Spell >> git-blame and git-log -L, which are supposed to be "the same" option, >> without the spaces to prevent confusion. > > I agree that this patch may reduce confusion locally, but if we were > to go in this direction, we should be consistent and enforce "stuck" > form everywhere, not just the options you happened to have passed > thru to gitk, but other options such as "-S <revs-file>", and also > other commands that do not have anything to do with gitk (e.g. "git > commit -C<commit>", not "git commit -C <commit>". Otherwise you > will give a wrong impression to readers as if they have to remember > which ones need to use the stuck form and which ones do not.
Hmm. Do you want to go there? (I can do it, but it'll obviously touch a lot of documentation.) -- Thomas Rast t...@thomasrast.ch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html