Johan Herland <jo...@herland.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:07 AM, Eric Wong <normalper...@yhbt.net> wrote:
> > How about we put a big warning of impending change in there for now and
> > wait until git 1.9/2.0 to make the actual change?
> 
> Sounds sensible. What should the warning look like, and where should
> it be placed? I'm thinking that if you run git svn init/clone without
> --prefix, there should be a verbose warning explaining (a) the trouble
> you're likely to encounter when using no prefix, and (b) the upcoming
> change in default prefix. Obviuosly, there should be a corresponding
> note in the git-svn manual page. Any other places in git.git that
> warrants changing? Hopefully this should be sufficient to trigger
> corresponding adjustments in third-party tools + docs ahead of the
> actual change in 1.9/2.0.

Probably, yes.  I don't remember off the top of my head if there's
other places, but init/clone should be a good enough start.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to