Jiang Xin <worldhello....@gmail.com> writes: > 2013/8/26 Jeremy Rosen <jeremy.ro...@openwide.fr>: >> >> nitpicking, but shouldn't this be worded as "up to date" rather than >> "identical" ? >> >> The reason is that identical gives the idea that the two branch happen to be >> on the same >> commit wheras "up to date" gives the idea that there is a special >> relationship between >> these two particular branches. We are not just listing all branches on the >> same >> commit as us, we are actively telling you about this branch because it's >> interesting >> to you. > > That's better. I want to use 'up to date' in the beginning, but I don't know > which prep. should be used. Now I realize I should: > > s/identical to/up to date with/
Yeah, that, or "in sync with" which may be a bit shorter. I'll queue with "up-to-date with", as "git grep 'up to date'" tells me that it is less common than "git grep 'up-to-date'", for now. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
