Dennis Kaarsemaker <den...@kaarsemaker.net> writes: > Apart from the exactly matching refspecs, does git in any other way > treat this as a special case?
Sorry, I do not quite understand, especially the "exactly matching" part, which as far as I know is not special (in other words, I am not sure what kind of "special casing" you are discussing). >> In any case, I've been assuming in this discussion "allow" is to >> silently accept, and overlaps are "warned" but not "rejected". So >> if you meant by 'outlaw' to die and refuse to run, that is not what >> I meant. > > Well, 1/3 is a warning on add, 3/3 is a warning and refusing to prune. By "refusing to prune" do you mean "error out with die()"? I was trying to make sure your "outlaw" was not something else (e.g. "die without not pruning anything that are not even overlapping"), which is probably too strong. I think what your patch did was "keep them around not pruned because we do not know where they came from" (I just checked $gmane/228589 again); that is in line with "warned but not rejected", so I think we are OK. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
