Richard Hansen wrote:
> On 2013-06-19 00:19, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
>> Is master~3 a committish? What about :/foomery?
>
> Yes; as documented, both of those are refs that point to a commit.
>From gitglossary(7):
ref
A 40-byte hex representation of a SHA-1 or a name that denotes a
particular object. They may be stored in a file under $GIT_DIR/refs/
directory, or in the $GIT_DIR/packed-refs file.
Do master~3 and :/foomery qualify as refs?
>> Look at the other forms in gitrevisions(7); master:quuxery,
>> master^{tree} are notable exceptions.
>
> gitrevisions(7) says that master:quuxery is a ref pointing to a blob or
> tree, so it is not a committish. However, if quuxery is a submodule, I
> would expect master:quuxery to point to a commit object and thus be a
> committish. So perhaps the <rev>:<path> description in gitrevisions(7)
> should be updated to accommodate submodules.
When quuxery is a submodule, master:quuxery refers to a commit object
that does not exist in the parent repository. I don't know what we
gain by documenting a comittish you can't even `show`.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
