Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> writes:

> As we should.
>
> Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  sequencer.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c
> index c217716..3aa480e 100644
> --- a/sequencer.c
> +++ b/sequencer.c
> @@ -127,6 +127,37 @@ static void add_rewritten(unsigned char *from, unsigned 
> char *to)
>       rewritten.nr++;
>  }
>  
> +static void run_rewrite_hook(void)
> +{
> +     struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
> +     struct child_process proc;
> +     const char *argv[3];
> +     int code, i;
> +
> +     argv[0] = find_hook("post-rewrite");
> +     if (!argv[0])
> +             return;
> +
> +     argv[1] = "rebase";
> +     argv[2] = NULL;

When the end-user action is "git cherry-pick A..B", shouldn't
the rewrite hook be called with "cherry-pick" not "rebase" as its
first argument?

More importantly, doesn't "git revert A..B" also trigger the
codepath for [4/8] and hence this function?

I think [3/8] --skip-empty makes sense also for revert, but I do not
think this one does as-is.  As what [4/8] introduces is a record of
"rewrite", the patch does not make sense either.  These two steps
would want to limit themselves to cherry-pick only, no?

> +     memset(&proc, 0, sizeof(proc));
> +     proc.argv = argv;
> +     proc.in = -1;
> +     proc.stdout_to_stderr = 1;
> +
> +     code = start_command(&proc);
> +     if (code)
> +             return;
> +     for (i = 0; i < rewritten.nr; i++) {
> +             struct rewritten_list_item *item = &rewritten.items[i];
> +             strbuf_addf(&buf, "%s %s\n", sha1_to_hex(item->from), 
> sha1_to_hex(item->to));
> +     }
> +     write_in_full(proc.in, buf.buf, buf.len);
> +     close(proc.in);
> +     finish_command(&proc);
> +}
> +
>  static void remove_sequencer_state(void)
>  {
>       struct strbuf seq_dir = STRBUF_INIT;
> @@ -1099,6 +1130,8 @@ static int pick_commits(struct commit_list *todo_list, 
> struct replay_opts *opts)
>               }
>       }
>  
> +     run_rewrite_hook();
> +
>       /*
>        * Sequence of picks finished successfully; cleanup by
>        * removing the .git/sequencer directory
> @@ -1136,14 +1169,24 @@ static int sequencer_continue(struct replay_opts 
> *opts)
>       }
>       if (index_differs_from("HEAD", 0))
>               return error_dirty_index(opts);
> +     {
> +             unsigned char to[20];
> +             if (!read_ref("HEAD", to))
> +                     add_rewritten(todo_list->item->object.sha1, to);
> +     }
>       todo_list = todo_list->next;
>       return pick_commits(todo_list, opts);
>  }
>  
>  static int single_pick(struct commit *cmit, struct replay_opts *opts)
>  {
> +     int ret;
>       setenv(GIT_REFLOG_ACTION, action_name(opts), 0);
> -     return do_pick_commit(cmit, opts);
> +     ret = do_pick_commit(cmit, opts);
> +     if (ret)
> +             return ret;
> +     run_rewrite_hook();
> +     return 0;
>  }
>  
>  int sequencer_pick_revisions(struct replay_opts *opts)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to