On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Michael Haggerty <mhag...@alum.mit.edu> wrote: > On 05/14/2013 04:24 PM, Johan Herland wrote: >> I am not sure why we would want "refs/remotes/%1/%2" instead of >> "refs/remote/%*". Maybe I've been staring at this for too long, but I >> find the latter shorter and more descriptive and the "%1/%2" notation >> needlessly cumbersome, especially if it's also supposed to match >> "foo/bar/baz" > > "refs/remotes/%1/%2" (or "refs/remotes/%1/%*") might be a nice way to > imply that the rule should only be attempted if the input has at least > two components, whereas something like "refs/heads/%*" would be applied > even for inputs with no slashes.
/me likes, at least for "refs/remotes/%1/%*". ...Johan -- Johan Herland, <jo...@herland.net> www.herland.net -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
