Martin von Zweigbergk wrote: > Normally one would break if unsuccessful. What would fail if this was > replaced by "do_next || break" and the above ".. && return 1" was ".. > && return". I assume that was your first attempt, but why did it not > work?
Thanks. This was a major thinko on my part, but I don't remember exactly why I got confused. I'll explain this patch properly in the next iteration. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
