On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Phil Hord <phil.h...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Felipe Contreras
>>> If you want to waste your time, by all means, rewrite all my commit >>> messages with essays that nobody will ever read. I'm not going to do >>> that for some hypothetical case that will never happen. I'm not going >>> to waste my time. >> >> This is not a hypothetical. Almost every time I bisect a regression >> in git.git, I find the commit message tells me exactly why the commit >> did what it did and what the expected result was. I find this to be >> amazingly useful. Do I need to show you real instances of that >> happening? No. I promise it did, though. > > Yes please. Show me one of the instances where you hit a bisect with > any of the remote-hg commits mentioned above by Thomas Rast. I made no such claim. In fact, I have never bisected to any remote-hg-related commit. I fail to see the relevance of this qualifier, though. P -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
