Junio C Hamano wrote: > Sounds like you are saying that you can pile a new command on top of > new command to solve what the existing tools people are familar with > can already solve in a consistent way without adding anything new. > Are you going to dupliate various options to "git diff" and "git > log" in "git diff-link"? Will you then next need "git log-link"?
What I'm saying is: As always, we start with plumbing and work our way up to porcelain. We do have git diff-files, diff-index, diff-tree, so I don't see what the problem with diff-link is. The point is that we can get an initial scripted version out quickly. And no, I never suggested a git log-link. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
